REXML | LibXML-Ruby | |
---|---|---|
create doc from filename | REXML::Document.new(filename) | XML::Document.file(filename) |
create doc from file | REXML::Document.new(file) | XML::Parser.io(file).parse |
grab to root of a doc | doc.root | doc.root |
create doc from string | REXML::Document.new(string) | parser = XML::Parser.new |
return all elements (not text nodes) | node.elements | node.find('*') |
xpath from element | elem[xpath](annoyingly can return a single item or an array) | elem.find(xpath) |
xpath to the first match | REXML::XPath.first(elem, xpath) | elem.find_first(xpath) |
grab text content of node | elem.text | elem.content |
working with attributes | elem.attributes[attr] | elem[attr] |
creating nodes | REXML::Element.new(name) | XML::Node.new(name) |
deep clone a node | elem.deep_copy | elem.copy(true) |
add a child element | node.elements.add(child) | node << child_node |
removing elements | parent.remove(child) | child.remove! |
jump to the next sibling | elem.next_element | elem.next |
can XPath node not in a document? | yes | no |
can add node directly from one document to another | yes | no |
Ok, for those of you that actually read all the way through the table the bonus is right down here, because the biggest difference between REXML and LibXML-Ruby is in the handling of default namespaces. A default namespace is a namespace placed on an XML document that acts as the default, that is it doesn't use a prefix. A good example of this is KML documents which are often defined like this:
With REXML, you can use XPath expressions with the assumption that you are referencing the default namespace and they will just work - no prefix necessary. With LibXML-Ruby, this is not the case. Say you have a reference to a node with LibXML-Ruby, and you want to run some XPath on it, with LibXML-Ruby you will be forced to do something like this:
I found an approach of registering a prefix for the default namespace on Bogle's Blog. While this is nice, you still can't register this once for the whole document, but must do it on each node you will be running an XPath expression on.
(On another note, did I just remove all carriage returns from my table to make blogger happy? Why yes, yes I did.)
No comments:
Post a Comment